Bioaccumulation of copper, lead, and zinc in six macrophyte species grown in simulated stormwater bioretention systems
Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN: 0301-4797, Vol: 166, Page: 267-275
2016
- 36Citations
- 11Usage
- 99Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef9
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Usage11
- Abstract Views11
- Captures99
- Readers99
- 99
Article Description
Stormwater bioretention (BR) systems collect runoff containing heavy metals, which can concentrate in soil environments and potentially leach into groundwater. This greenhouse experiment evaluated differences among six plant species undergoing three varying hydraulic and pollutant loads in their bioaccumulation potential when subjected to continual application of low metal concentrations as a means of preventing copper, lead, and zinc accumulation in the BR soil. Results show that >92% of metal mass applied to the treatments via synthetic stormwater was removed from the exfiltrate within 27 cm of soil depth. Compacted soil conditions of unplanted controls retained significantly more Cu, Pb, and Zn than Carex praegracilis, and Carex microptera treatments. Differences in above and below ground plant tissue concentrations differed among species, resulting in significant differences in mass accumulation. In the above ground tissue, from highest to lowest, Phragmites australis accumulated 8 times more Cu than Scirpus acutus, and C. microptera accumulated 18 times more Pb, and 6 times more Zn than Scirpus validus. These results, and differences among species in mass distribution of the metals recovered at the end of the study, reveal various metal accumulation mechanisms.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479715303170; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945364415&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26517275; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479715303170; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cee_facpub/1927; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2928&context=cee_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.019
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know