Spatial transferability assessment of a composite walkability index: The Pedestrian Index of the Environment (PIE)
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, ISSN: 1361-9209, Vol: 57, Page: 378-391
2017
- 39Citations
- 536Usage
- 165Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations39
- Citation Indexes39
- 39
- CrossRef10
- Usage536
- Downloads464
- Abstract Views72
- Captures165
- Readers165
- 165
Article Description
This paper analyzes the transferability of a composite walkability index, the Pedestrian Index of the Environment (PIE), to the Greater Montréal Area (GMA). The PIE was developed in Portland, Oregon, and is based on proprietary data. It combines six urban form variables into a score ranging from 20 to 100. The measure introduces several methodological refinements which have not been applied concurrently in previous efforts: a wide coverage of the different dimensions of the urban form, together with the use of a distance-based decay function and modelling-based weighing of the variables. This measure is applied to the GMA using local data in order to evaluate the feasibility of its transfer (the possibility of locally replicating the measure). It is then included in a series of mode choice models to assess its transferability (the capacity of the measure to describe walkability and predict mode choice in another urban area). The models, segmented by trip distance or trip purpose, are estimated and validated against observed trip data from the 2013 Origin-Destination survey. Significant positive correlation is found between the PIE and the choice of walking for short trips, for all purposes as well as for four specific trip purposes. The inclusion of the PIE also improves the accuracy of the modelling process as well as the prediction of the choice of walking for short trips. The PIE can therefore be used in the GMA, and potentially in other metropolitan areas, to improve the modelling of travel behavior for short trips.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920916309488; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.018; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042187555&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361920916309488; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1361920916309488?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1361920916309488?httpAccept=text/plain; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cee_facpub/3658; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4661&context=cee_facpub; https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cengin_fac/420; https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1434&context=cengin_fac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.018
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know