Increasing Access to Augmentative and Alternative Communication Services for People with Complex Communication Needs During COVID-19 and Beyond
Vol: 1, Issue: 2
2021
- 1,377Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,377
- Downloads971
- Abstract Views406
Article Description
The COVID-19 global pandemic has affected the disability network across the world. In the United States, there are millions of people who cannot use their natural speech to communicate. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), a form of assistive technology (AT), helps people with complex communication needs (CCNs) to communicate with others. Examples of AAC include printed pictures and speech-generating devices. A team of professionals work together with the person with CCNs and their caregivers to choose the right type of AAC. Often, people with CCNs need face-to-face and ongoing AAC support. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, this population already faced multiple challenges to receive on-going support and services due to multiple factors, including limited access to AAC specialists and travel constraints. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many services for people with CCNs stopped to abide by stay-at-home orders and ensure the safety of the person with CCNs and their caregivers. This paper describes how one AT Program at a University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (UCEDD) adapted AAC services and increased access to support using (a) tele-AAC assessment practices, (b) services through a partnership with our state AT Act program, and (c) tele-coaching strategies to help providers and caregivers in their facilitation and implementation of AAC services. We also discuss key considerations in tele-AAC practices to help people with CCNs and their caregivers during COVID-19 and beyond.
Bibliographic Details
Utah State University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know