Dinitrogen fixation in a montane forest sere determined by 15 N 2 assimilation and in situ acetylene-reduction methods
Soil Biology and Biochemistry, ISSN: 0038-0717, Vol: 19, Issue: 4, Page: 465-471
1987
- 19Citations
- 70Usage
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef13
- Usage70
- Abstract Views70
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
Annual N input rates in a Rocky Mountain forest sere were determined by 15 N 2 assimilation in an aerobic atmosphere using Swaby-type electrolytic O 2 -producing incubation flasks, and by in situ enclosures employing C 2 H 2 reduction methods. It was determined that the input in a subalpine meadow was 0.33, in aspen 0.52 and in spruce sites 0.32 kg N ha −1 yr −1, respectively, by combined non-symbiotic and associative-symbiotic fixation. The in situ C 2 H 2 reduction values equated with the 15 N 2 fixation values if a ratio of 7.5 C 2 H 2 reduced to 1 N 2 fixed was used. Symbiotic fixation by a lupine in the aspen site added 0.63 kg N ha −1 yr −1. The associate-symbiotic fixation contributed 14% of the N input in the meadow, 30% in the aspen, and nil in the coniferous stands estimated by the C 2 H 2 reduction method in situ. The results supported the conclusions that the N 2 fixation, similar to other microbiological characteristics of the aspen and conifer sites, agrees with the accepted definition of a successional forest sere.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0038071787900393; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90039-3; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0023488044&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0038071787900393; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:0038071787900393?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:0038071787900393?httpAccept=text/plain; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/aspen_bib/3452; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4454&context=aspen_bib; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/docdan/112; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1111&context=docdan; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717%2887%2990039-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717%2887%2990039-3; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0038071787900393?via%3Dihub; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0038071787900393
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know