The Effect of Income Taxes on Optimal Portfolio Selection
Economics Research Institute Study Paper, Vol: 8, Page: 1-11
1999
- 420Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage420
- Downloads401
- Abstract Views19
Article Description
The ability to shelter both the periodic contribution and annual returns from income taxes in a qualified retirement plan provides well known advantages. However, given aggressive investing and a continuation of historic rates of return on financial assets, it is probable that both income during the retirement years and the effective tax rate will be higher than in the working years. Consequently, part of the additional expected return to taking greater risk is lost to taxes. This paper demonstrates that efficient (i.e., utility-maximizing) portfolio design must account for the potential for higher average and marginal income tax rates in retirement. Failure to fully consider the ultimate tax effects probably will result in a suboptimal portfolio of assets during both the accumulation and distribution phases. In generally, failure to consider progressive taxes will result in portfolio being overinvested in the high-risk asset.
Bibliographic Details
Utah State University Department of Economics
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know