Unified Rating Equations for Cutthroat Flumes Derived from a Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Model
2012
- 2,544Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2,544
- Downloads2,288
- 2,288
- Abstract Views256
Thesis / Dissertation Description
A sophisticated mathematical model of three-dimensional hydraulics was used to develop complete calibrations for Cutthroat flumes, which are structures used in canals (or “open channels”) to measure flow rates. Although Cutthroat flumes have been used for many years, and much research has been done on their calibrations and application in the field, never before was there a complete set of calibration parameters for all 24 standard flume sizes. This research was validated by previously published laboratory results on prototype flumes at Utah State University and elsewhere, and it was successful in generating accurate calibration parameters for all 24 flume sizes, plus all intermediate sizes. Thus, the results can be applied in general, with no loss in flow measurement accuracy for even the best previous calibration findings. Furthermore, the calibration equations produced as a result of this research do not depend on the distinction between free- and submerged-flow regimes, which has been a source of confusion and error in many field applications of these (and other) flumes.With these new calibration results, flow measurement in irrigation and other canals is more convenient, accurate, and straightforward than ever before. This is important because flow measurement is critical for evaluating water management, verifying compliance with legal and environmental concerns, and in implementing operational plans for irrigation systems and other open-channel water delivery and or removal systems.
Bibliographic Details
Utah State University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know