Survey of selected additively manufactured propellants for arc ignition of hybrid rockets
Journal of Propulsion and Power, ISSN: 1533-3876, Vol: 32, Issue: 6, Page: 1494-1504
2016
- 32Citations
- 464Usage
- 50Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations32
- Citation Indexes32
- 32
- CrossRef20
- Usage464
- Downloads408
- Abstract Views56
- Captures50
- Readers50
- 50
Conference Paper Description
Results of a testing campaign to assess multiple commercially available three-dimensional printer materials for effectiveness in an arc-ignition system for hybrid rockets are presented. Previously, a form of additive manufacturing known as fused deposition modeling was used to fabricate high-density acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) fuel grains so that, when properly layered, they possess unique electrical breakdown properties. When subjected to an inductive charge, an electrical arc flows along the layered material surface and seeds combustion when the arc occurs simultaneously with the introduction of an oxidizing flow. This study investigates commercially available threedimensional printable materials to search for equivalent or possibly superior fuel alternatives to ABS. Test specimens include photopolymers processed using polyjet (stereolithography) and fused-deposition printing. Comparison metrics include general arc ability, pyrolysis rate, dissipated power, characteristic velocity, and ability for multiple restarts. Initially, an ensemble of eight commonly available "printable" polymers was evaluated, and only four printable materials (high-and low-density ABS, VeroClear®, and white polycarbonate) were found to possess effective sparking properties. In follow-on burn tests, only high-and low-density ABS and VeroClear performed effectively as fuel materials. White polycarbonate would not ignite using the arc method. High-density ABS exhibited the best overall ignition properties and characteristic velocity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84994143486&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.b36106; https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.B36106; http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/1.B36106; http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.B36106; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mae_facpub/115; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=mae_facpub
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know