Random forests regression for soft interval data
Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, ISSN: 1532-4141, Page: 1-20
2024
- 53Usage
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage53
- Downloads45
- Abstract Views8
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Article Description
Analyzing soft interval data for uncertainty quantification has attracted much attention recently. Within this context, regression methods for interval data have been extensively studied. As most existing works focus on linear models, it is important to note that many problems in practice are nonlinear in nature and the development of nonlinear regression tools for interval data is crucial. This paper proposes an interval-valued random forests model that defines the splitting criterion of variance reduction based on an L type metric in the space of compact intervals. The model simultaneously considers the centers and ranges of the interval data as well as their possible interactions. Unlike most linear models that require additional constraints to ensure mathematical coherences, the proposed random forests model estimates the regression function in a nonparametric way, and so the predicted interval length is naturally nonnegative without any constraints. Simulation studies show that the new method outperforms typical existing regression methods for various linear, semi-linear, and nonlinear data archetypes and under different error measures. To demonstrate the applicability, a real data example is presented where the price range data of the Dow Jones Industrial Average index and its component stocks are analyzed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85203496596&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2024.2396401; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03610918.2024.2396401; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mathsci_facpub/285; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1425&context=mathsci_facpub
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know