Measurement of Conductivity and Charge Storage in Insulators Related to Spacecraft Charging
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, ISSN: 0018-9499, Vol: 50, Issue: 6 I, Page: 2284-2291
2003
- 88Citations
- 770Usage
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations88
- Citation Indexes88
- 88
- CrossRef76
- Usage770
- Downloads750
- Abstract Views20
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Conference Paper Description
Improved experimental methods are discussed for laboratory measurement of conductivity and electric field in insulating spacecraft material intended for space radiation and plasma environments. These measurement techniques investigate the following features: 1) measurements of conductivity are up to four orders of magnitude smaller than those determined by existing standard methods. 2) Conductivity is altered as radiation accumulates and trapping states fill with electrons. 3) With intense kiloelectronvolt electron irradiation, electrons are continually emitted for hours from the irradiated surface after the irradiation ceases. 4) Charging induced by electron irradiation is strongly modified by the electron-hole pairs that the irradiation generates in the insulator. 5) High field effects at 10 V/cm act strongly on the electron-hole pairs and on electrons in shallow traps to provide extended conductivity. 6) The capacitance of the sample can be measured in the same apparatus along with the other testing. 7) Visible light can be used to investigate conduction by electrons (or holes) emitted from shallow trapping levels. The qualitative physics of such processes in solid dielectrics has long been known, and instrumentation is developed here for measuring the effects in practical spacecraft charging applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=1242310247&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tns.2003.821397; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1263873/; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx5/23/28269/01263873.pdf?arnumber=1263873; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1263873/; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/physics_facpub/712; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3016&context=physics_facpub; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mp_facpub/29; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=mp_facpub
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know