First Decadal Response to Treatment in the Acadian Forest Ecosystem Research Program
2009
- 82Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage82
- Abstract Views82
Artifact Description
Maintenance of late-successional structures to enhance biodiversity and sequester carbon has been a major focus of forest research over the past two decades. Several long-term, disturbance-based silvicultural trials have been installed to try to balance the maintenance of complex forest conditions yet allow for economical extraction of timber. One of the oldest of these contemporary efforts is the Acadian Forest Ecosystem Research Program (AFERP) located in central Maine. AFERP is now nearly 15 years old and, having received its second harvest entry, allows for a decadal review of its long-term sustainability in terms of forest growth, regeneration response, and maintenance of complex forest structure. AFERP includes two versions of ‘expanding gap’ treatments on a 100-year rotation: a ‘large-gap’ system that encourages regeneration of species with intermediate shade tolerance by using 0.2 ha gaps expanded every 10 years; and a ‘small-gap’ system that encourages shade-tolerant species with smaller 0.1 ha gaps expanded every 20 years. AFERP also includes an unharvested control and is replicated three times across nine 8.7-11.3 ha units. Prior to treatment, there was no significant difference among units in either total volume or basal area (275±11 m3 ha-1 and 37.7±1.1 m2 ha-1, respectively [mean± 1 S.E.]). Following treatment, there were significant differences in both volume and growth, often due to differences in regeneration response and differential mortality patterns among the treatments. For example, basal area growth averaged 0.22±0.04 m2 ha-1 yr-1, -0.08±0.13 m2 ha-1 yr-1 and -0.27±0.15 m2 ha-1 yr-1 for the large gap, small gap and control treatments, respectively; this resulted from higher levels of balsam fir and paper birch mortality in the small gap and control treatments. Further, there were strong treatment effects on regeneration composition, with both gap systems having much denser Pinus strobus and Picea spp. regeneration than controls.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know