Automated Fleet Commissioning Workflows at Planet
2021
- 830Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage830
- Downloads447
- Abstract Views383
Artifact Description
In order to maintain the world’s largest Earth Observation satellite constellation and its goal of providing daily Earth coverage, Planet procures regular launch opportunities, each including up to several dozens of new satellites. Commissioning these batches of satellites, known at Planet as “flocks”, from deployment until imaging is done by a small team of operators and depends heavily on a number of automated workflows developed at Planet. Bringing all satellites to production in a safe and timely manner has a direct link to the productivity of the entire fleet. The main bottleneck during commissioning is ground station access time with the satellites, which are concentrated close to one another on-orbit after launch. To circumvent this, it is key to develop a solution that optimizes the number of contacts needed per satellite and distributes the available accesses effectively. Through the power of automation, Planet has been able to develop a commissioning process that can support a large number of satellites at any given time progressing in parallel through the different phases of commissioning, creating a fast, efficient, and safe commissioning workflow. This paper will present an overview of how Planet commissions new Super Dove satellites, the automated solutions and improvements implemented overtime, and on-orbit results and lessons learned from the most recent commissioning campaigns: Vega VV16 (Flock 4V), Electron “In Focus” (Flock 4EP) and SpaceX Transporter-1 (Flock 4S).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know