Creating a Setup to Assess the Use of Virtual Reality for Mission Control
2021
- 500Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage500
- Downloads272
- Abstract Views228
Artifact Description
This paper describes a work in progress. We are preparing our first cubesat mission, InnoCube, which we plan to launch in spring 2023. We are also in the process of moving the whole chair to another building, and creating a new mission control room. We take this as an opportunity to try and compare some novel approaches, that might make the work of the ground team easier.Our mission, InnoCube, is designed to test a “skip the harness (skith)” approach, which means the system is comprised of multiple autonomous computing nodes communicating wirelessly with each other. Each of these nodes is running an operating system instance of Rodos (Real time Onboard Dependable Operating System). As we are going to launch at least 16 computers within our 3U cubesat, it will create a lot of telemetry to keep an eye on. Hence, we set out to create an environment that allows us to explore and compare different ways to represent all this data, in order to give human operators a good view, of what is happening, without overwhelming them. We aim to find out whether the possibilities of a virtual environment help or hinder operators in their work, and if, which of the virtual representations facilitate understanding of complex data.In this paper we will describe the design and technologies we employ to build two systems: the regular mission control room featuring displays and standard human computer interfaces, and a virtual representation created in Unity, accessible via VR headset, in which operators are free to move around and interact using gestures. We explain how we work with Rodos and the Corfu framework, to derive the data to be displayed from the on-board-software and which representations we create with it. We depict the ways the components of the system interact and which measurements we will attempt, but the usability research itself will take place after the conference, when the integration is complete and is likely to be the topic of a later paper.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know