Development of a Simulation Framework for CubeSat Performance Modeling
2022
- 354Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage354
- Downloads211
- Abstract Views143
Artifact Description
Space systems are notoriously difficult to develop due to the nature of the environment in which they must operate. Designers have only a limited window to ensure systems will function as intended, placing a high importance on testing. This paper discussed the ongoing development of a simulation framework to support Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) testing of CubeSat subsystem hardware. This work is being conducted at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) in support of the institution’s CubeSat program. The simulation framework is organized into the classic spacecraft subsystems. Each of these subsystems will support a software model and interfaces for the integration of flight hardware into the simulation framework. In demonstration of this concept, propulsion hardware has been successfully integrated into the model environment. Telemetry reception and command transmission within the simulation framework is functional and demonstrated. A loop containing the propulsion hardware, simple controller, and orbital motion propagator was developed to demonstrate the HIL test functionality of the simulation framework. This focus on the development of the propulsion HIL test configuration is a point of distinction from other HIL simulations, which typically focus on the Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS). Presented results validate successful integration of propulsion subsystem hardware into the simulation framework. Future work will focus on the integration of CubeSat subsystem models into the framework.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know