Estimating carnivoran diets using a combination of carcass observations and scats from GPS clusters
Journal of Zoology, ISSN: 0952-8369, Vol: 286, Issue: 2, Page: 102-109
2012
- 44Citations
- 7Usage
- 232Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations44
- Citation Indexes44
- 44
- CrossRef34
- Usage7
- Abstract Views7
- Captures232
- Readers232
- 232
Article Description
Scat analysis is one of the most frequently used methods to assess carnivoran diets, and global positioning system (GPS) cluster methods are increasingly being used to locate feeding sites for large carnivorans. However, both methods have inherent biases that limit their use. GPS methods to locate kill sites are biased towards large carcasses, while scat analysis overestimates the biomass consumed from smaller prey. We combined carcass observations and scats collected along known movement routes, assessed using GPS data from four African lion Panthera leo prides in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, to determine how a combination of these two datasets change diet estimates. As expected, using carcasses alone underestimated the number of feeding events on small species, primarily impala Aepyceros melampus and warthog Phacochoerus africanus, in our case, by more than 50%, and thus significantly underestimated the biomass consumed per pride per day in comparison with when the diet was assessed using carcass observations alone. We show that an approach that supplements carcass observations with scats that enables the identification of potentially missed feeding events increases the estimates of food intake rates for large carnivorans, with possible ramifications for predator-prey interaction studies dealing with biomass intake rate. © 2011 The Authors. Journal of Zoology © 2011 The Zoological Society of London.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856297849&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22408290; https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wild_facpub/2014; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3014&context=wild_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x/abstract; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know