Large predators and their prey in a southern African savanna: A predator's size determines its prey size range
Journal of Animal Ecology, ISSN: 0021-8790, Vol: 73, Issue: 3, Page: 410-423
2004
- 255Citations
- 7Usage
- 660Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations255
- Citation Indexes255
- 255
- CrossRef228
- Usage7
- Abstract Views7
- Captures660
- Readers660
- 660
- Mentions4
- References4
- Wikipedia4
Article Description
1. A long-term (13-year) data set, based on > 4000 kills, was used to test whether a sympatric group of large predators adheres to the theoretical predictions that (1) mean prey body size and (2) prey diversity increase as functions of predator body size. 2. All kills observed by safari guides are documented routinely in Mala Mala Private Game Reserve, South Africa. We analysed these records for lion (Panthera leo, Linnaeus), leopard (Panthera pardus, Linnaeus), cheetah (Acinony x jubatus, Schreber) and African wild dog (Lycaon pictus, Temminck). Males and females of the sexually dimorphic felid species were treated as functionally distinct predator types. Prey types were classified by species, sex and age class. 3. Prey profiles were compared among predator types in terms of richness and evenness to consider how both the range of prey types used and the dominance of particular prey types within each range may be influenced by predator size. No significant size-dependent relationships were found, so factors separate from or additional to body size must explain variation in prey diversity across sympatric predators. 4. A statistically strong relationship was found between mean prey mass and predator mass (r = 0.86, P = 0.002), although pairwise comparisons showed that most predators killed similar prey despite wide differences in predator size. Also, minimum prey mass was independent of predator mass while maximum prey mass was strongly dependent on predator mass (r = 0.71, P = 0.017). The ecological significance is that larger predators do not specialize on larger prey, but exploit a wider range of prey sizes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=2342590766&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00817.x; https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00817.x; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wild_facpub/2053; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3053&context=wild_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00817.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know