Predictive modelling of ecological patterns along linear-feature networks
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, ISSN: 2041-210X, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: 329-338
2017
- 10Citations
- 2Usage
- 117Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- CrossRef10
- 10
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures117
- Readers117
- 117
Article Description
Ecological patterns and processes often take place within linear-feature networks, and this has implications when analysing the spatial configuration of such patterns or processes across a landscape. One such pattern is the use of landscapes by human recreationists: an important variable in animal habitat selection and behaviour. Due to the difficulty in obtaining data, ecologists tend to use coarse metrics such as linear-feature density, while the extent and timing of human activity are often ignored. Remote detector equipment and its increasing use in ecological studies allow for large volumes of data on human activity to be collected. However, the analysis of these data still can be challenging. Using a combination of generalised linear mixed-effects models and network-based ordinary kriging, we developed a method for estimating spatial and temporal variations in motorised and non-motorised activities across a complex linear-feature network. Trail cameras were set up between 2012 and 2014 and monitored motorised and non-motorised activities at 238 different trail sites across a 2824 km region of the eastern slopes and foothills of central Alberta's Rocky Mountains. We evaluate the predictive capacity of this approach, demonstrate its application and discuss its merits and limitations. This method offers a straightforward analysis that can be applied to remotely acquired data to give a useful metric for assessing wildlife responses to human activity, and has potential application beyond the highlighted example.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84997701998&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12660; https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2041-210X.12660; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/2041-210X.12660; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/2041-210X.12660/fullpdf; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12660; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wild_facpub/2762; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3762&context=wild_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12660
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know