Intravenous estrogen is not proven effective for abnormal uterine bleeding: guidelines are based on flawed evidence
Clinical Research in Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates, Vol: 1, Issue: 1
2015
- 3Citations
- 818Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Usage818
- Downloads611
- Abstract Views207
Article Description
A critical appraisal and clinical application of: DeVore GR, Owens O, Kase N. Use of intravenous Premarin in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding--a double-blind randomized control study. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Mar;59(3):285-91.This appraisal identifies significant statistical irregularities in the study. A reworking of the study's statistics leads to a conclusion different from that put forth by the authors of this paper: intravenous estrogen therapy is not, in fact, significantly more effective compared to placebo therapy for the cessation of acute abnormal uterine bleeding.
Bibliographic Details
http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/crp/vol1/iss1/3/; http://dx.doi.org/10.22237/crp/1423243521; https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/crp/vol1/iss1/3; https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=crp; https://dx.doi.org/10.22237/crp/1423243521; https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/crp/vol1/iss1/3/
Wayne State University Library System
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know