Invited debate are per-family type I error rates relevant in social and behavioral science?
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, ISSN: 1538-9472, Vol: 14, Issue: 1, Page: 12-23
2015
- 48Citations
- 3,769Usage
- 48Captures
- 8Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations48
- Citation Indexes48
- 48
- CrossRef40
- Usage3,769
- Downloads1,971
- 1,971
- Abstract Views1,798
- 1,798
- Captures48
- Readers48
- 48
- Mentions8
- References8
- Wikipedia8
Article Description
The familywise Type I error rate is a familiar concept in hypothesis testing, whereas the per-family Type I error rate is rarely addressed. This article uses Monte Carlo simulations and graphics to make a case for the relevance of the per-family Type I error rate in research practice and pedagogy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84950281209&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453040; https://jmasm.com/index.php/jmasm/article/view/750; https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol14/iss1/5; https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1855&context=jmasm; https://dx.doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453040
The Netherlands Press
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know