Surgical Humanization in H. C. Andersen’s “The Little Mermaid”
Vol: 31, Issue: 2
2017
- 365Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage365
- Abstract Views356
- Downloads9
Article Description
In Hans Christian Andersen’s “The Little Mermaid,” bodily mutilation—exchanging a fishtail for legs and giving up a voice—is presumed necessary to become human. Using the lens of disability studies, I explore the paradox of the mermaid’s amputations. On the one hand, Andersen’s story incorporates a religious framework in which a maimed body is a holy body. Yet the insistence on surgically correcting the mermaid’s body to make her human troublingly endorses aesthetic norms. The ending of the tale, in which the mermaid is neither human nor mermaid, is Andersen’s attempt to reckon with the paradox.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know