Severe Constraints, Radical Possibilities: Reimagining Critical Pedagogy In The First-Year Writing Class
2023
- 16Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage16
- Downloads9
- Abstract Views7
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Critical pedagogues often bring political questions into the classroom and seek to disassemble the very paternalistic, repressive nature of education itself. However, while these scholars and the texts they write are well-intentioned, the possibility of achieving political goals in a first-year writing class are severely constrained by forces within and outside an instructor's control: committees, composition directors, university administration, state & federal governments, economic & social conditions, etc. That said, looking at the material history of writing studies, there have been moments of radical possibility, opportunities to fundamentally change the status quo for the better. In this dissertation, I argue that despite these constraints, many of which are outside of our control, there are opportunities to enact the political program of critical pedagogy in the first-year writing classroom and even work toward larger programmatic reforms. However, the key to enacting this program is in understanding the material history of writing studies, building on the work of anti-racist teacher-scholars, and then, most importantly, embracing the Marxist roots of critical pedagogy. Through reconnecting critical pedagogy to Marxism, I argue that critical pedagogues benefit from definitional & programmatic coherence in the first-year writing classroom, a better understanding of how political action takes place, and, ideally, allows room for critical pedagogues to work on radical projects outside of curricular reform
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know