Development and initial psychometric evaluation of a culturally- sensitive beliefs about personal weight survey
2012
- 446Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage446
- Downloads362
- Abstract Views84
Thesis / Dissertation Description
ABSTRACTDEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OFA CULTURALLY-SENSITIVE BELIEFS ABOUT PERSONAL WEIGHT SURVEYbySTEPHANIE PICKETTDecember 2012Advisor: Dr. Rosalind PetersMajor: NursingDegree: Doctor of PhilosophyThe purpose of this study was to develop and perform initial psychometric evaluation of an instrument that measures beliefs about personal weight in young African American women. Beliefs about personal weight were defined as a multidimensional concept consisting of the convictions regarding the descriptive characteristics, causal attributions, and consequences of one's personal weight. The theory of self-care (Orem, 2001) was used to conceptualize concepts and conceptual relationships.The Beliefs about Personal Weight Survey (BPW) was developed using three phases: phase one included item development and culturally sensitivity analysis; phase two included expert content validation, face validity and pretesting; and phase three included initial psychometric evaluation to establish beginning evidence of reliability and validity.The BPW was developed as a culturally-sensitive, norm-referenced survey with five-point likert responses with three domains, 16 composites from principle component analysis and 57 items. The BPW was evaluated in a non probability sample of 150 community-dwelling African American women. Results of the initial psychometric evaluation demonstrates that the BPW composites performed well with evidence of reliability and content, construct and criterion validity within and across the descriptor, cause, and consequence domains. The BPW composites also exhibited predictive ability for weight management behaviors (i.e., eating behaviors, physical activity) and actual weight.Key findings from this study indicate that African American women`s beliefs about the descriptors, causes and consequences of their personal weight is associated with weight management behaviors and actual weight. These findings have important implications for instrument development, theory development and clinical practice.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know