Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth
International Journal of Exercise Science, ISSN: 1939-795X, Vol: 17, Issue: 4, Page: 1530-1539
2024
- 224Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage224
- Downloads131
- Abstract Views93
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
International Journal of Exercise Science 17(4): 1530-1539, 2024. The aim of this study was to compare the warm-up effects of a treadmill walking warm-up (TW) with a dynamic warm-up (DW) on the responses to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in youth. A sample of 16 active youth (age 13.6 ± 1.8 yr) were tested for peak oxygen uptake (VO peak) using the Fitkids treadmill test protocol on 2 nonconsecutive days following different 6-min warm-up procedures. The TW consisted of walking on a treadmill at 2.2 mph and 0% grade whereas the DW consisted of 12 bodyweight exercises with a 2 kg medicine ball. Maximal heart rate (HR) was significantly higher following DW vs TW (200.8 ± 6.16 vs. 197.9 ± 7.3 bpm, respectively; p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found between DW and TW for VO peak (50.5 ± 9.9 vs 50.6 ± 11.1 ml/kg/min), maximal minute ventilation (V; 93.0 ±21.4 vs. 92.7 ±21.2 L/min), maximal respiratory exchange ratio (1.19 ± 0.08 vs 1.22 ± 0.08), and total exercise test time (668.1 ± 103.5 vs 686.3 ± 97.0 s), respectively. During the Fitkids treadmill test protocol HR and V were significantly higher following DW vs TW at stage 1, stage 2, stage 3 and stage 4, and oxygen uptake was significantly higher following DW vs TW during stage 1 (all p < 0.05). Findings indicate a DW elicits a higher maximal HR and higher submaximal HR, V, and oxygen uptake values than TW during CPET in youth, although no differences in VO peak were observed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85210094517&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.70252/xqrc2496; https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijes/vol17/iss4/28/; https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijes/vol17/iss4/28; https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4179&context=ijes; https://dx.doi.org/10.70252/xqrc2496
International Journal of Exercise Science, L.L.C.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know