Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ISSN: 1091-6490, Vol: 120, Issue: 43, Page: e2206981120
2023
- 9Citations
- 19Usage
- 15Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef3
- Usage19
- Downloads14
- Abstract Views5
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Reports on Data Sharing Findings from Washington University School of Medicine Provide New Insights (Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data)
2023 OCT 27 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Information Technology Daily -- Investigators publish new report on data sharing. According to
Article Description
In January 2023, a new NIH policy on data sharing went into effect. The policy applies to both quantitative and qualitative research (QR) data such as data from interviews or focus groups. QR data are often sensitive and difficult to deidentify, and thus have rarely been shared in the United States. Over the past 5 y, our research team has engaged stakeholders on QR data sharing, developed software to support data deidentification, produced guidance, and collaborated with the ICPSR data repository to pilot the deposit of 30 QR datasets. In this perspective article, we share important lessons learned by addressing eight clusters of questions on issues such as where, when, and what to share; how to deidentify data and support high-quality secondary use; budgeting for data sharing; and the permissions needed to share data. We also offer a brief assessment of the state of preparedness of data repositories, QR journals, and QR textbooks to support data sharing. While QR data sharing could yield important benefits to the research community, we quickly need to develop enforceable standards, expertise, and resources to support responsible QR data sharing. Absent these resources, we risk violating participant confidentiality and wasting a significant amount of time and funding on data that are not useful for either secondary use or data transparency and verification.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85175160169&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206981120; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831745; https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2206981120; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/oa_4/3233; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4224&context=oa_4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know