Randomized Phase III SIERRA Trial of I-Apamistamab before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Versus Conventional Care for Relapsed/Refractory AML
Journal of Clinical Oncology, ISSN: 1527-7755, Vol: 43, Issue: 2, Page: 201-213
2025
- 1Citations
- 8Usage
- 11Captures
- 29Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Usage8
- Downloads5
- Abstract Views3
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
- Mentions29
- News Mentions29
- News29
Most Recent News
Novel Radioconjugate or Conventional Care Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory AML
As reported in Journal of Clinical Oncology by Gyurkocza et al, the phase III SIERRA trial has shown higher rates of durable complete remissions with
Article Description
PURPOSEOlder patients with relapsed or refractory AML (RR AML) have dismal prognoses without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). SIERRA compared a targeted pretransplant regimen involving the anti-CD45 radioconjugate I-apamistamab with conventional care.METHODSSIERRA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02665065) was a phase III open-label trial. Patients age ≥55 years with active RR AML were randomly assigned 1:1 to either an I-apamistamab-led regimen before alloHCT or conventional care followed by alloHCT if initial complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) occurred. Initial response was assessed 28-56 days after alloHCT in the I-apamistamab group and 28-42 days after salvage chemotherapy initiation; patients without CR/CRp or with AML progression could cross over to receive I-apamistamab followed by alloHCT. The primary end point was durable complete remission (dCR) lasting 180 days after initial CR/CRp. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), assessed hierarchically in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population.RESULTSThe ITT population included 153 patients (I-apamistamab [n = 76]; conventional care [n = 77]). In total, 44/77 conventional care arm patients crossed over and 40/77 (52%) received I-apamistamab and alloHCT, with six patients (13.6%) experiencing a dCR. In the ITT population, the dCR rate was significantly higher with I-apamistamab (17.1% [95% CI, 9.4 to 27.5]) than conventional care (0% [95% CI, 0 to 4.7]; P <.0001). The OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.41; P =.96), and the EFS HR was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.34), with HR <1 favoring I-apamistamab. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 59.7% and 59.2% of the I-apamistamab and conventional care groups, respectively.CONCLUSIONThe I-apamistamab-led regimen was associated with a higher dCR rate than conventional care in older patients with RR AML. I-apamistamab was well tolerated and could address an unmet need in this population.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85205359562&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.23.02018; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02665065; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39298738; https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.23.02018; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/oa_4/4673; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5662&context=oa_4
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know