BOLD correlates of trial-by-trial reaction time variability in gray and white matter: A multi-study fMRI analysis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 4, Issue: 1, Page: e4257
2009
- 261Citations
- 91Usage
- 410Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations261
- Citation Indexes261
- 261
- CrossRef153
- Usage91
- Downloads79
- Abstract Views12
- Captures410
- Readers410
- 410
Article Description
Background: Reaction time (RT) is one of the most widely used measures of performance in experimental psychology, yet relatively few fMRI studies have included trial-by-trial differences in RT as a predictor variable in their analyses. Using a multi-study approach, we investigated whether there are brain regions that show a general relationship between trial-by-trial RT variability and activation across a range of cognitive tasks. Methodology/Principal Findings: The relation between trial-by-trial differences in RT and brain activation was modeled in five different fMRI datasets spanning a range of experimental tasks and stimulus modalities. Three main findings were identified. First, in a widely distributed set of gray and white matter regions, activation was delayed on trials with long RTs relative to short RTs, suggesting delayed initiation of underlying physiological processes. Second, in lateral and medial frontal regions, activation showed a "time-on-task" effect, increasing linearly as a function of RT. Finally, RT variability reliably modulated the BOLD signal not only in gray matter but also in diffuse regions of white matter. Conclusions/Significance: The results highlight the importance of modeling trial-by-trial RT in fMRI analyses and raise the possibility that RT variability may provide a powerful probe for investigating the previously elusive white matter BOLD signal. © 2009 Yarkoni et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0004257; 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g008; 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=59249092918&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19165335; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g008; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g005; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/746; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1745&context=open_access_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g008; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g005; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004257; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g008; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004257.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0004257
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know