Principals' Perceptions of Factors Affecting Middle Schools
1977
- 18Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage18
- Downloads12
- Abstract Views6
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The purpose of the study was to compare the perceptions of junior high school principals and middle school principals concerning the aspects affecting conversion of junior high schools to middle schools.A questionnaire was used to collect responses from junior high school and middle school principals. The questionnaire, designed to elicit data, was mailed to twenty-two junior high school and middle school principals employed in the Albuquerque Public Schools system. The respondents were divided into two groups: (1) junior high school principals, and (2) middle school principals. The latter were further divided to identify middle school principals who had been involved in a conversion from junior high school to middle school and those middle school principals who were not involved in the process of conversion. The comparisons, when tested by chi-square, showed that significant differences existed in several categories. The findings were:1. No significant difference existed between the principals' responses to their perceptions or qualifications and attitudes of administrators.2. No significant difference existed between the principals' responses to their perceptions of professional development programs.3. No significant difference existed between the perceptions of junior high and middle school principals concerning in-service programs. However, middle school principals involved in the conversion process, were more concerned about in-service programs than were the principals of middle school not involved in the conversion process.4. Principals of junior high schools were less concerned about middle school objectives than were principals of middle schools. There was no significant difference in the perceptions of the two middle school sub-groups.5. No significant difference existed between theperceptions of junior high school principals and middle school principals concerning curriculum development programs. Middle school principals involved in the process of conversion were less concerned about curriculum than were principals of middle schools who had not yet been involved in the conversion process.6. No significant difference existed between the principals' responses to perceptions of planning in middle schools.7. No significant difference existed between the principals' responses to their perceptions of teacher responsibilities.8. Junior high school principals were less concerned about problems affecting middle schools than were principals of middle schools. There was no significant difference between the two middle school sub-groups.9. Junior high school principals were less concerned about progressive reorganization than were middle school principals. There was no significant difference between the two middle school sub-groups.10. Significant differences existed between the junior high and middle school principals concerning aspects of evaluation affecting middle schools. There was also significant difference between the two middle school sub-groups.It was concluded that the ten categories listed in this study were recognized by the respondents as ones of considerable importance to the conversion process. Differences that existed between the groups of principals were differences of degrees of concern rather than concern versus non-concern.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know