Steve de Shazer’s Theory Development
Vol: 7, Issue: 1
2021
- 19Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage19
- Downloads14
- Abstract Views5
Article Description
Cet article trace l’évolution de la pensée théorique de Steve de Shazer de 1969 jusqu’à son décès en 2005. Après avoir passé en revue sa définition de « théorie », nous organisons le développement de sa théorisation en 4 phases, distillant de chacune les axiomes qu’il a continué à tenir jusqu’à sa mort. Pour chaque axiome, nous indiquons comment il est fondamental à une compréhension de SFBT et, par conséquent, contribue à distinguer SFBT des autres thérapies parlantes. Nous restons proches des écrits de Shazer en citant fréquemment ses nombreux articles et 6 livres. Nous concluons avec un résumé de ce que nous croyons sont les 6 axiomes durables de sa théorie d’une thérapie brève axée sur la solution. Les caractéristiques frappantes de la façon dont il a développé ses théories au fil des ans, la nouvelle lentille qu’il nous a laissé pour regarder les interactions thérapeutiques, et un exemple de recherche qui promet d’élargir son héritage théorique.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know