A Combined Approach to Evaluating Student Engagement in a Virtual Laboratory Environment
2020
- 192Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage192
- Abstract Views96
- Downloads96
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study measured student engagement with galvanic skin response (GSR) using a one group randomized pretest–posttest design in a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning environment to develop effective intervention strategies for engaging students in STEM learning experiences. Student engagement is a multi-dimensional interrelated construct, consisting of emotional, behavioral, and cognitive components, and varies in different subjects and learning environments. Student engagement in higher education is associated with academic achievement, retention, and graduation. In this study, the emotional, behavioral, and cognitive engagement data of 30 college students were obtained using self-report surveys, observation and physiological data, which was recorded using a GSR device while students performed a virtual laboratory activity. A repeated measures ANOVA indicated a statistically significant effect of lab activity type with high GSR peaks per minute (F (2,58) = 20.40, p
Bibliographic Details
https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/4081; https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5085&context=thesesdissertations; http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/23469756; https://dx.doi.org/10.34917/23469756; https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/4081/
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know