Faculty institute on research based-learning in high impact courses
2011
- 73Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage73
- Downloads58
- Abstract Views15
Artifact Description
In Spring 2009, the Library Advisory Board agreed to fund a proposal for the Libraries to collaborate with campus partners to provide support to faculty who were faced with several initiatives that impact the way faculty deliver their course content, develop their assignments and assess their success. These initiatives include the movement to large enrollment classes, especially for large impact, core courses; the redesign of the general education requirements around universal learning outcomes; and, enhancing the first-year experience for incoming students. There is no single entity on campus in a position to provide the faculty support and development needed.The Libraries collaborated with several campus partners, OIT, Office of Academic Assessment, Teaching and Learning Center, and the Provost's Office to create an Institute for faculty who are teaching large enrollment, first-year courses. Particular courses were targeted, a brochure was created, and a committee began working on the curriculum of the Institute. A primary goal of the Institute was to embed library resources into research-based learning, so Liaison Librarians were included as full participants in the Institute. Sixteen faculty members and 8 Liaison Librarians participated in the Institute, which was held January 4-6,2010. Two follow-up, half day sessions are scheduied for Spring semester 2010.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know