Reversing trust and suspicion, integrating Ontology and Epistemology: a dialogue with Paul Ricoeur, Evangelicals, and outsiders
2009
- 2Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This thesis identifies a problematic and proposes its solution. The problem is that certain tensions necessary to Christian life and praxis (i.e., between confidence and humility, knowledge and experience, truth and love) have become rigidified into hierarchies, a problem attributable to and / or exemplified in recent perspectives in evangelical, biblical hermeneutics.These perspectives rightly emphasize (i) the Holy Spirit's assistance in interpretation and (ii) the benefit of proper, exegetical method in knowing God. Yet in claiming that Spirit-endowed Christians are better readers of the world and the Bible than non-Christians, have these perspectives weighted confidence in the Spirit's aid over the humility requisite to being finite and sinful? Likewise, in claiming that Christians who start with the Bible and read it properly will understand God better than Christians who do not, have these perspectives prioritized knowing about God to experiencing God-textual examination to embodied understanding?Ironically, setting confidence over humility can lead to knowing less (or wrongly): illegitimately viewing oneself and one's community as self-sufficient. The risk is solipsism. Equally, setting textual explanation over lived understanding can result in overlooking truth: judging messages according to their methods risks neglecting other, truthful views of world and text. The risk is sectarianism. In both cases, are evangelicals guilty of valuing (biblical) truth over love (of neighbour)?Paradoxically, where these hermeneutical perspectives are normative (as standards of faithfulness) within Christian communities, these communities need outsiders to awaken them to the imbalances in these tensions.I contend, at base, that love and truth are co-central to humanity and God, whence "loving my neighbour as myself' means attending to his / her views (and truth) as closely as I consider my own and those of my community. By corollary, I hypothesize that Christians may know themselves, the Bible, and the world more truly by listening to and where appropriate, learning from-truth-seeking outsiders.I investigate this hypothesis by supplementing a theological approach with a philosophically hermeneutical perspective. Thus I use two themes in Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutics- listening and suspecting, belonging and distance-to engage with ideological outsiders (Freud and Nietzsche) and methodological outsiders (liberation theology).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know