The case for studying religious truth claims In public education
2009
- 7Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage7
- Abstract Views7
Artifact Description
Americans have grappled with church and state relations since the birth of the nation. One important battleground between the secular and religious is in public education. Two centuries after the American public school systems were developed; religion in the classroom continues to be a contentious issue. Currently, public schools are afraid to touch the issue of religion and explore it academically even though it has been an enormous source of influence and conflict throughout civilization, let alone the history of the United States. Students are taught about the broad basic beliefs and practices of a religion, but are not able to critically examine religious truth claims. Allowing students to examine whether religious beliefs are legitimate coincides with the purposes of a liberal education, which examines all possible avenues of truth. Once students have a better understanding of the justifications for various religious beliefs, they will be better equipped to understand and operate in today’s religiously plural world. My proposal is not to challenge the religious beliefs of students, but simply explore the truth claims religion makes about reality and the purpose of life. Students will be taught how to think independently and critically about religious truth claims, which will open a much-needed dialogue between secular and religious views about the nature of religion.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know