A Comparison of New Skill Acquisition: Athletes and Musicians
2013
- 13Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage13
- Abstract Views13
Artifact Description
Pseudoarithmetic has previously been used to investigate new skill acquisition. The current research extends learning research with old and young adults to young athletes and musicians using a pseudoarithmetic task. The group with the combination of attributes (i.e., athletic musicians) was hypothesized to show the fastest learning. Alphabet arithmetic was used to assess reaction time based learning curves. No differences among groups were found in the participants’ slopes and y-intercepts from the log-log learning curves or block by block accuracy. Nevertheless, post-hoc analyses revealed differences among type of athletic activity (collapsed across musician status), such that non-endurance athletes learned faster than endurance athletes.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know