Freely Flowing: Openly Accessible Sources for Streaming Video
Accentuate the Positive: Charleston Conference 2012
2013
- 417Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage417
- Downloads355
- Abstract Views62
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
There is considerable disagreement within the academic and library spheres as to what can be done to make streaming content available. The process of providing streaming content is expensive, labor intensive, and time consuming. This process, however, doesn’t always require prolonged licensing negotiations, expenditure of precious materials budgets, or large investment of personnel time and effort to digitize, upload, and maintain content. There are many websites that provide quality videos that libraries and media centers can both access and provide access to with minimal effort. This paper offers a list of these legal, openly accessible resources, along with a brief overview of the content that can be found on each.
Bibliographic Details
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2012/Tech/6/; http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315140; https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2012/Tech/6; https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1397&context=charleston; https://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315140; https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2012/Tech/6/
Purdue University Press
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know