The collapse of the Alto Rio building during the 27 February 2010, Maule, Chile earthquake
Page: 1-332
2011
- 665Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage665
- Abstract Views665
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The Alto Rio building, a fifteen-story building located in Concepción, Chile, collapsed during the 2010 Maule, Chile, Earthquake. Construction of the building was completed in 2009 following the Chilean building code of 1996. The building was provided with structural reinforced concrete walls (occupying 7% of the floor area) to resist lateral and vertical loads. The walls failed in the first story causing the overturning of the entire building. Analyses show that the building was more likely to form a failure mechanism in the second story than in the first story. The inconsistency between analysis results and field evidence implies that the strength of the first story was reduced by factors not considered in conventional analysis. Furthermore, field observations indicate that bond failures occurred in lap splices in the first story. These observations and the analysis results suggest that bond failure in the first story is likely to have triggered the collapse.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know