On the use of vortex generators to control cavitation in a backward facing step flow
Page: 1-161
2007
- 487Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage487
- Abstract Views487
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Cavitation inception was studied for vortex-generator-controlled, backward-facing step flow to reveal the relationship of the modified viscous flow structures and cavitation inception. Comparison with a baseline backward facing step flow was made, and the issues of using vortex generators to control cavitation inception was discussed. Non-cavitating flow fields for both baseline and control cases were measured using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV). Pressure field, which is important to cavitation inception, was simulated using the commercial software FLUENT. Cavitation was achieved in the high expansion ratio (ER = 1.9) test section by operating the flow system at a higher flow rate. Flow visualization of cavitation inception was performed using PIV. The vortex-generator-modified shear layer was found to cavitate earlier than the baseline backward facing step flow. The cavitation zones on the center and side planes of the controlled case appear slightly different. On the center plane, adjacent to the shear layer, the cavitation zone extended to the core region of the separation bubble. The cavitation zone did not appear in the region of high velocity fluctuations. The shear layer strength (ω a)* proved to be a good predictor of cavitation location. While vortex generators can be used to control cavitation, the induced streamwise vortices result in detrimental effects, which outweigh their control benefits.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know