The use of oral history and narrative research in broadening the historical foundation of the agricultural communication field
Page: 1-203
2015
- 52Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage52
- Abstract Views52
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The historical foundation of the agricultural communication community (consisting of both academics and the profession) is shallow and void of humanistic perspective, and there is a minimal amount of historical content that focuses on academic and professional history. The need to explore and interpret historical dimensions of this field is vital to further development of the discipline as an academic and professional field. Oral history was utilized to capture and preserve the interview content from a small sample of agricultural communication and Extension professionals and faculty while narrative research, interpretative theory, and constructivism were utilized to further understand and interpret their oral history data generated from the interviews. This process includes exploring the oral history transcribed from interviews, and then coded utilizing initial coding to identify themes. Numerous themes then emerged, but my research centers on three themes: women in the agricultural communication field, departmental mergers, and technology. Interpretative theory and constructivism were further utilized to explore themes that emerged during the transcription process. From there, narrative research was applied, and the purpose of narrative research is to further understand and explore perspective. It was important to see how narrative research can reshape the current historical narrative in order to include these perspectives which have either been ignored, misinterpreted, or unknown. The oral history content has also provided for a tremendous amount of new interesting and provoking historically-related content that can be discussed, debated, and utilized in numerous capacities.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know