Shear strength and behavior of reinforced concrete structures with T-headed bars in safety-related nuclear facilities
Page: 1-249
2015
- 158Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage158
- Abstract Views158
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The design of concrete structures for safety-related nuclear facilities is governed by demands calculated for load combinations involving the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE). Excessive amounts of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement (in excess of 2% reinforcement ratio) are required to provide essentially elastic behavior for the SSE and to resist the design demands. Additionally, conventional single-leg tie reinforcement with 90° and 135° hooks at alternate ends are required at some locations for seismic detailing. All these requirements lead to rebar congestion, and make conventional single-leg ties difficult to install in reinforced concrete structures. T-headed bars are being considered to resolve this issue. These consist of deformed reinforcing bars with T-heads in the form of welded or threaded rebar terminators with bearing area greater than or equal to four times the reinforcing bar area. To investigate the effectiveness of T-headed bars for use as single-leg ties, this type of reinforcement was used as shear reinforcement in beam specimens to investigate the anchorage ability of the T-heads to develop the yield strength of the tie bars. These tests were needed because the experimental data regarding the shear strength of reinforced concrete structures with T-headed bars is lacking. This study presents the results of an experimental investigation and numerical analysis conducted to evaluate the shear strength and behavior of reinforced concrete beams using T-headed bars as shear reinforcement, and to extrapolate from those results the suitability of T-headed bars for use as single-leg ties. The behavior of specimens with three different depths of 18 in., 24 in., and 36 in. and three different T-headed bar sizes (#5, #7, and #9) are investigated and compared with the behavior of companion specimens with conventional stirrups.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know