IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW
Page: 1-143
1983
- 408Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage408
- Abstract Views408
Thesis / Dissertation Description
A laboratory experiment was conducted to study impression management in the employment interview. In doing so, additional factors which might affect the influence of interpersonal skills were also studied. Specifically, this study looked at the effect of nonverbal behaviors in the formation of impressions and decisions in the job interview, while varying both the qualifications of the applicant and type of job. It was expected that both nonverbal behavior and applicant qualifications would influence the decisions made in the interview. However, it was also hypothesized that the amount of influence of the nonverbal behavior would be affected by both the type of job and the qualifications of the applicant. Significant main effects were found for both nonverbal behavior and qualifications level. That is, both good interpersonal skills and high qualifications resulted in favorable evaluations of the interviewee. However, the relevance of interpersonal skills to the position opening had no effect on ratings given to the applicants. In addition, the predicted nonverbal cues x qualifications interaction was, although significant, in the opposite direction as predicted. That is, nonverbal skills were important for the qualified applicant but did not compensate for a lack of qualifications. A number of possible explanations for the absence of the predicted pattern of results are offered.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know