An investigation of a construct of scientific literacy
Page: 1-183
1988
- 2Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Much rhetoric has been promulgated concerning the scientific literacy of American students and science teachers. Yet, perceptions and assessments of scientific literacy vary as to definition and measurement. The focus of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis concerning scientific literacy and science teachers. Four studies from a poll of 663 were deemed appropriate for analysis. Of these studies (one a meta-analysis), effect size was greater in those measuring parameters similar to NAEP criteria. Curricula that emphasized an integration of science/technology/society conceptualizations produced "more literate" individuals than did studies of scientific literacy utilizing other assessment criteria. Because so few true experiments were located, these results must be viewed tentatively at best. In addition, an instrument was designed and piloted in a course that followed the NAEP assessment criteria. In pretesting, science education students performed no differently than did other non-science education students. Post-testing after 11 weeks indicated significant changes in the knowledge, understanding, and decision-making skills of science education students as compared to other education students, producing effect sizes similar to those found in the meta-analysis.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know