Bayesian sequential reliability for Weibull and related distributions
Page: 1-102
1991
- 7Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage7
- Abstract Views7
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Assume that the probability density function for the lifetime of a newly designed product has the form: $\lbrack H\prime(t)/Q(\theta)\rbrack $exp$\{-H(t)/Q(\theta)\}$. The Exponential ${\cal E}(\theta)$, Rayleigh, Weibull ${\cal W}(\theta,\beta)$ and Pareto pdf's are special cases. $Q(\theta)$ will be assumed to have an inverse Gamma prior. Assume that m independent products are to be tested with replacement. A Bayesian Sequential Reliability Demonstration Testing plan is used to either accept the product and start formal production, or reject the product for reengineering. The test criterion is the intersection of two goals, a minimal goal to begin production and a mature product goal. The exact values of various risks and the distribution of total number of failures are evaluated. Based on a result about a Poisson process, the expected stopping time for the exponential failure time is also found. Also, a discrete BSRDT plan is discussed. The exact forms of the various risks the distributions of the number of failures and sample size are evaluated. If only one unit at a time tested, the expected testing time is given in closed form. Some asymptotic properties of the discrete BSRDT plan are also discussed. Under suitable conditions, the discrete BSRDT plan is asymptotically equivalent to the Bayes sequential test. A stepwise testing model generalizes the testing model. A predictive BSRDT plan is proposed, which is based on the predictive distribution of a future observation. Various interesting quantities mentioned above can be evaluated as well. Bayesian analysis for a Poly-Weibull p.d.f. under some proper and noninformative priors are discussed. A recursive formula to compute the relative posterior p.d.f. will be developed. This formula generalizes a result by Berger(1990), and reduces the total number of computations for Poly-Webull distributions from $m\sp{n}$ to ${m + n\choose m}.$
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know