A fuzzy logic approach to road project selection: A case study of Indonesia
Page: 1-391
1992
- 4Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4
- Abstract Views4
Thesis / Dissertation Description
There has been a growing concern about the appropriateness of the existing project selection system for dealing with current situations in road improvement programming in Indonesia. Current situations are characterized by following interrelated problems: (1) funds needed to eliminate the current backlog of deteriorated roads far exceed available funds; (2) the high race of road deterioration; (3) lack of reliable data; (4) frequent project implementation delays; (5) significant adverse impacts of poor road conditions on other development activities; (6) involvement of many complex factors including social, economic, political, and environmental factors, where most of these factors are not completely defined, cannot be precisely measured, or are qualitative in nature; and (7) involvement of subjective judgments in project selection practice. To deal with these situations, the study proposed appropriate analytical tools by considering the road improvement programming process in a comprehensive manner, incorporating an assessment of present degree of deterioration and implementation requirements, recognizing needs for short term programming, and developing a simple data acquisition system. The analytical tools were developed based on a fuzzy logic approach. A fuzzy logic employs approximate, rather than exact, modes of reasoning. A basic concept in fuzzy logic that plays a key role in many of its applications is the use of linguistic variables. A linguistic variable enables decision makers to incorporate subjectivity, experience, and knowledge in an intuitive and natural way. Also, it enables field data collectors to undertake consistently subjective and approximate assessments. The data acquisition system used in the proposed methodology was developed to consider not only technical aspects such as pavement condition and geometric elements, but also broad considerations such as impacts on the surrounding community, implementation readiness, policy-related factors, and a control measure for implementing agencies. The components of the analytical tools included the following: (1) computation of the relative importance of contributing factors by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); (2) assessment of the values of contributing factors from their corresponding indicators by using a knowledge-based expert system; and (3) ranking of candidate projects by employing fuzzy sets theory.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know