A study of the trade-offs between balance and randomness in various sequential sampling procedures
Page: 1-114
1994
- 1Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
Thesis / Dissertation Description
One of the main aspects of a sampling procedure is the design which specifies how samples are repeatedly collected. There are many circumstances where a subset of size r is repeatedly chosen from a finite population of K elements (1 $\le r < K).$ For instance, a committee or a jury of size r is repeatedly formed from a panel of size K. Another interesting case is in comparative clinical trials where eligible subjects arrive sequentially and r of the K treatments under study must be assigned immediately to the subjects. A completely random sampling scheme is free of experimental bias and provides a basis for statistical inference precision. On the other hand, a balanced sampling scheme strengthens efficiency in statistical inference procedures. We study three sequential sampling procedures, Biased Coin Design with Imbalance Tolerance, Ehrenfest Urn Design, and a Modified Ehrenfest Urn Design, in CHAPTER 2, CHAPTER 3, and CHAPTER 4, respectively. The trade-offs between balance and randomness under the three designs are analyzed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know