Student Engagement in an Online Engineering Afterschool Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, ISSN: 2157-9288, Vol: 12, Issue: 2
2022
- 1Citations
- 1,029Usage
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage1,029
- Downloads666
- Abstract Views363
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
The COVID-19 pandemic forced much of schooling online and limited students’ access to informal learning opportunities such as afterschool programs. The purpose of this study was to investigate how fourth-and fifth-grade students engaged in an online engineering program and what factors influenced their engagement. We drew on a four-dimensional model of student engagement to describe how students engaged in the afterschool engineering program and to identify the factors that enhanced or inhibited engagement. Using a case study design, we drew on interviews with six program mentors and ten students and observation data from weekly Zoom sessions throughout the 2020–2021 school year. We found examples of all four dimensions of engagement, but also of disengagement. The program influenced student engagement in multiple ways, including through the program mentors’ social, pedagogical, and managerial roles, students’ interest in and enjoyment of engineering, the drawbacks and benefits of the online learning environment and Zoom’s affordances, and the nature of the program’s activities. We connect these factors to the different dimensions of engagement. We conclude with a discussion of how our findings add to research on engineering education in informal online settings and offer implications for practitioners.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143433855&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1347; https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jpeer/vol12/iss2/1; https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1347&context=jpeer; https://dx.doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1347; https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jpeer/vol12/iss2/1/
Purdue University (bepress)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know