Improved Signature Definition through Boundary-Edited Clustering
1976
- 100Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage100
- Abstract Views51
- Downloads49
Article Description
It is desirable to enhance the performance of clustering techniques, so that cluster statistics more usefully represent the true spectral classes in the scene. If to is done, then improvements in classification can be realized, leading for example to more accurate large area crop surveys.To improve the statistics available from a clustering algorithm, an edge-detection algorithm is used. The edge detector provides the cluster routine with inputs to filter out pixels which are likely to represent spectral response to a mixture of more than one ground cover type. The result is that the proportion of pixels representing pure classes in the scene is enriched.While nearly all boundary detection algorithms are candidates for such use, to paper deals primarily with one which uses a gradient technique. Briefly, the gradient technique measures the spatial rate of change of signal value, averaged over all spectral bands. This is done by performing subtractions between neighboring pixels, and combining the along-scan and across-scan differences. Once the "gradient" at each point is calculated, a threshold is established so as to reject a specified percentage of the pixels to be used by the cluster routine. The paper will discuss the choice of the threshold, so as to filter most "mixture" pixels and yet avoid discarding too much, and perhaps losing high-texture ground cover types.The effect of using the gradient filter on clustering seems to lie primarily in causing a greater proportion of pixels to fall in clusters which are near modes representing pure cover types, but also in bunching of the cluster centers somewhat closer to the modes. This aspect is discussed in conjunction with how the gradient filter affects the overall distribution function. In the quest toward improving techniques of clustering, a useful goal should be to improve the positioning of cluster centers relative to meaningful modes in the distribution. The enhancement of modes by the gradient filtering is an important step.Two significant advantages are believed to result from the technique. First, it provides a suitable means of data reduction when clustering large scenes, so as to save processing costs. And second, the clusters which result more accurately represent the true ground classes, leading to better classification performance and more effective use of cluster-based signature extension techniques.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know