Quantification of uncertainty in a stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurement
2014
- 209Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage209
- Downloads106
- Abstract Views103
Article Description
In Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (Stereo-PIV), the three velocity components are obtained by illuminating a planar region in the flow field and recording the region of interest using two cameras at an angle. Calibration, planar velocity estimation, and velocity reconstruction are the three essential steps involved in the process. Earlier efforts to quantify the accuracy in a Stereo-PIV measurement process have shown higher error in out of plane motion. However, a detailed analysis of the measurement uncertainty involved in a Stereo-PIV calibration-based reconstruction process has yet to be presented. This analysis provides a detailed framework to specify the uncertainty in the coefficients of the calibration mapping function and the uncertainty involved in self-calibration step for correction of the registration error. Using Taylor series expansion for uncertainty propagation the contribution of the calibration step uncertainties are combined with planar field uncertainties to predict the overall uncertainty in the reconstructed velocity components. The analysis is tested using simulated random field images and experimental vortex ring images. The results emphasize the sensitivity and interdependence of the individual uncertainties involved in each step of a Stereo-PIV measurement process.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know