Culminating a CS undergraduate program with a high integrity software course
Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, ISSN: 1539-4565, Page: 25-28
2006
- 1Citations
- 1Usage
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures4
- Readers4
Conference Paper Description
Many programs have developed capstone courses as a way of providing students a culminating experience. These capstone experiences tend to be large scale projects solving some real problem for an internal or external client. These courses are usually well received by the students. But by focusing on a real-world need, various aspects of the curriculum may not be integrated into the solution. This paper describes some experiences with using the SPARK language in a high integrity software course. It then shows how such a course can link almost every aspect of a computer science undergraduate curriculum into a single culminating course. © 2006 IEEE.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=48749113400&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fie.2006.322373; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4116853/; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx5/4116829/4116830/04116853.pdf?arnumber=4116853; https://docs.rwu.edu/seccm_fp/81; https://docs.rwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=seccm_fp
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know