Judicial Perspective and Mentorship at the Supreme Court: A Review Essay on In Chambers: Stories of Supreme Court Law Clerks and Their Justices, Edited by Todd C. Peppers and Artemus Ward
Vol: 51, Issue: 1, Page: 217
2012
- 227Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage227
- Downloads219
- Abstract Views8
Review Description
In their recently released book, In Chambers: Stories of Supreme Court Law Clerks and Their Justices ("In Chambers"), editors Todd Peppers and Artemus Ward offer a collection of previously published articles and new unpublished essays on select justices and their clerks to illuminate how the personal relationships between justices and clerks impact the Court. Contributors include distinguished law professors, judges, academics, and legal correspondents. Peppers and Ward are certainly qualified to talk about the Supreme Court clerkship institution. Six years ago, Peppers released Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise and Influence of the Supreme Court Law Clerk and Ward, along with David L. Weiden, wrote Sorcerers' Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court. These books, based on archival papers, interviews and surveys with former clerks, offered behind-the scenes looks at the institutional development of the law clerk institution and how it evolved since its nineteenth century beginnings. Now, the authors assemble a collection of first-hand accounts of the inter-workings of the justices' chambers from the perspective of former law clerks, and cover the origins of the clerkship institution, the pre-modern clerkship institution, and the modern clerkship institution.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know