Clinical Simulation Training to Increase Medical Surgical New Graduate Registered Nurse (NGRN) Confidence and Competence When Caring for Deteriorating Patients: A Quality Improvement Project
2022
- 340Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage340
- Downloads211
- Abstract Views129
Manuscript Description
Problem: Patient harm from preventable cardiac arrest continues despite implementation of Rapid Response Teams (RRT) in the hospital setting. Medical surgical NGRNs lack adequate practice experience to prepare themselves with the competency skills necessary to manage high acuity patients in a complex healthcare environment. An awareness of a lack of readiness for practice leads to low NGRN self-confidence. Deficiencies in NGRN self-confidence and clinical competence lead to an inability to recognize and respond to patient complications with subsequent ineffective use of the RRT. Failure to Rescue (FTR) is one of the top three medical errors committed by NGRNs. Current evidence supports additional education on deteriorating patients within the residency period using clinical simulation training (CST). Purpose: The purpose of this project is to increase NGRN self-confidence and clinical competence when caring for deteriorating patients using CST embedded within a NGRN hospital residency program. Methods: This quality improvement (QI) project focused on delivery of a pre-scenario educational module and deteriorating patient simulation experience with structured debriefing to medical surgical NGRNs. Results: Knowledge, satisfaction, and self-confidence scores increased post-project. Post-project competence scores did not meet minimum expected requirements. However, participants reported increased self-awareness of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement leading to enhanced assessment skills and clinical judgement. Conclusions: Clinical simulation can increase NGRN self-confidence and competence by offering practice and self-reflection leading to improved outcomes for deteriorating patients.Keywords: recognition of deteriorating patient, new graduate registered nurse, clinical simulation, confidence, competence, rapid response
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know