Quantifying Iron Overload using MRI, Active Contours, and Convolutional Neural Networks
2019
- 451Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage451
- Downloads321
- Abstract Views130
Paper Description
Iron overload, a complication of repeated blood transfusions, can cause tissue damage and organ failure. The body has no regulatory mechanism to excrete excess iron, so iron overload must be closely monitored to guide therapy and measure treatment response. The concentration of iron in the liver is a reliable marker for total body iron content and is now measured noninvasively with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI produces a diagnostic image by measuring the signals emitted from the body in the presence of a constant magnetic field and radiofrequency pulses. At each pixel, the signal decay constant, T2*, can be calculated, providing insight about the structure of each tissue. Liver iron content can be quantified based on this T2* value because signal decay accelerates with increasing iron concentration. We developed a method to automatically segment the liver from the MRI image to accurately calculate iron content. Our current algorithm utilizes the active contour model for image segmentation, which iteratively evolves a curve until it reaches an edge or a boundary. We applied this algorithm to each MRI image in addition to a map of pixelwise T2* values, combining basic image processing with imaging physics. One of the limitations of this segmentation model is how it handles noise in the MRI data. Recent advancements in deep learning have enabled researchers to utilize convolutional neural networks to denoise and reconstruct images. We used the Trainable Nonlinear Reaction Diffusion network architecture to denoise the MRI images, allowing for smoother segmentation while preserving fine details.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know