Exploring Recognition, Rewards, And The Multi-Generational Workforce During the COVID-19 Pandemic
2024
- 600Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage600
- Downloads398
- Abstract Views202
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study sheds light on the importance of rewards and recognition programs in improving employee engagement and highlights the need for organizations to rethink their rewards and recognition strategies to better meet the needs of multi-generational employees. One problem found in organizations was that many current multi-generational employees had low engagement due, in part, to outdated rewards and recognition programs (Agarwal et al., 2018; North, 2017; O.C. Tanner Institute, 2021). There was a gap in research regarding multi-generational employees in multiple professions and their perceptions of rewards and recognition and how those monetary and non-monetary rewards could affect their engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States (De-la-Calle-Duran & Rodriquez-Sanchez, 2021). This study aimed to explore how multi-generational employees described the value of and perceived the impact of personalized rewards and recognition on their workplace engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-2023. This hermeneutic phenomenological research study sought an understanding of the lived experiences of eight participants from different generations and was guided by the generational cohort theory and the theory of acquired needs. Four themes emerged from the analysis. The findings of this study implied that rewards and recognition programs can be improved, managers should be more supportive in times of organizational change, and employees did not feel recognized for their work-related efforts during the pandemic, which has the potential to improve human resources policies in many organizations. The action plan recommends that managers be more cognizant of their employees’ work-related achievements and include employees in the rewards process.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know